Anyone who starts researching trauma therapy runs into the same wall fairly quickly. There are several distinct approaches, each has advocates who describe it as the one that finally works, and the descriptions are written in language that assumes you already know the difference. For someone who is trying to decide whether to book an appointment at all, that is not a helpful place to begin.

The approaches genuinely are different, and the differences are worth understanding, because the fit between a person and a method has a real effect on how the work goes.

Why One Approach Does Not Cover Everyone

Trauma does not present in a single shape. Two people can go through comparable events and end up needing quite different things.

One person may find that the memory itself is intact and accessible, that they can describe what happened in detail, and that the difficulty lies in the beliefs that formed afterward. Another may have very little narrative memory of the event and a great deal of physical response, arriving in the office with sleep problems, a startle reflex, and a body that reacts before any thought has formed.

Those two situations respond to different work. That is the underlying reason the field contains several established methods rather than converging on one, and it is also why a first session usually involves more questions about how the difficulty shows up than about what happened.

Talk-Based Approaches

Cognitive approaches, including Cognitive Processing Therapy and trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, work primarily with meaning. The event happened, and the person drew conclusions from it about themselves, about other people, and about how safe the world is. Those conclusions then shape decisions for years afterward.

The work involves examining those conclusions carefully, testing them against evidence, and building a more accurate account. It is structured, it is usually time-limited, and it suits people who process things verbally and want a clear sense of where the sessions are heading.

It is also demanding. Talking through the material in detail is part of the method, and some people find that this is manageable while others find it is not, at least not at the start.

EMDR

EMDR stands for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, and it is one of the more widely used trauma treatments in Canada, appearing in a number of clinical practice guidelines for post-traumatic stress.

The method asks a person to hold a distressing memory in mind while following a repeated form of bilateral stimulation, most commonly guided eye movements. Over a series of sets, the memory typically becomes less vivid and less physically charged, and the associated beliefs often shift alongside it.

Two things tend to surprise people. The first is how little talking is required, which makes it workable for people who cannot yet describe what happened out loud. The second is that it is not a passive process, and sessions can be tiring even though the person is mostly sitting quietly.

EMDR requires specific training, and certification through EMDRIA is the recognized standard. It is a fair question to ask any prospective therapist, since the approach is only as good as the training behind it. Living Well Counselling Services has EMDRIA-certified therapists among its team, and their EMDR therapy page explains how sessions are structured.

Somatic and Body-Based Work

Somatic approaches start from the position that trauma responses are held physically as well as cognitively, and that working only at the level of thought can leave the body’s alarm system untouched.

Sessions involve attention to physical sensation, to where tension sits, and to the point at which the nervous system tips from manageable into overwhelmed. The work is often slow and deliberately so, since the aim is to expand what a person can tolerate rather than to push through it.

This tends to suit people whose symptoms are strongly physical, and people who have already done a good deal of talking about their history without much change in how their body responds.

Choosing Without Getting Stuck

Most people do not need to arrive having chosen. A therapist trained across several approaches will make a recommendation after the first session or two, and combinations are common, with stabilization work early on and processing work once a person has enough capacity for it.

The more useful questions to ask a prospective therapist are practical ones. What approaches are they trained in, what would they suggest for your situation and why, and how will you both know whether it is working. Clear answers are a good sign. Vagueness is worth noticing.

On Timing

There is a widespread assumption that trauma therapy should wait until life is otherwise stable, and that is only partly true. Serious instability, whether that is an unsafe living situation or untreated addiction, does need attention first, and a responsible therapist will say so.

Outside of that, waiting for a calm stretch often means waiting a very long time. Good trauma work builds stability as part of the process rather than requiring it as a precondition.

Living Well Counselling Services in Calgary offers trauma therapy across three locations and online throughout Alberta, with free initial consultations for people who want to talk through the options before committing. That conversation is usually worth having, even for people who conclude that the timing is not right yet.

Living Well Counselling Services Contact Information

Locations

Kensington: 415 14th St NW, Calgary, AB

Inglewood: 39 – 35 Inglewood Park SE, Calgary, AB

Douglasdale: 11410 27 St SE, Calgary, AB

Phone

403.695.7911 (call) | 587.579.7911 (call or text)

Email

[email protected]

Website

Map

Get Directions